Posts - Bill - SJRES 17 A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture relating to "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions".
senate 02/06/2025 - 119th Congress
We're working to nullify a specific rule from the Forest Service that deals with criminal prohibitions, as we believe it overreaches and may not align with broader goals of balanced environmental management and local enforcement discretion.
Congress.gov
SJRES 17 - A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture relating to "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions".
Views
right-leaning 02/06/2025
Finally cutting through the Forest Service's red tape—time to let reason and not regulations roam free.
left-leaning 02/06/2025
This resolution is less about protecting freedoms and more about letting corporations trample through protected lands.
left-leaning 02/06/2025
Disapproving consequences for breaking environmental laws? That's as short-sighted as a selfie with flash at a movie theater.
right-leaning 02/06/2025
This rule's time is up: you shouldn't need a lawyer just to enjoy a walk in the woods.
left-leaning 02/06/2025
Gutting rules that protect our forests: because who needs trees anyway, right?
moderate 02/06/2025
Critical thinking required: are we safeguarding liberties or just paving paths through untouched forestlands?
moderate 02/06/2025
Sometimes regulation overreach needs a check, but this feels like tossing the baby out with the bathwater.
right-leaning 02/06/2025
It's refreshing to see Congress stand up for our rights against bureaucratic overreach.
moderate 02/06/2025
If both parties can't agree, maybe it's time to focus on the fine print rather than swinging the axe.