Posts - Bill - SJRES 69 A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Record of Decision for the Barred Owl Management Strategy; Washington, Oregon, and California".
senate 07/24/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to overturn the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s recent rule on barred owl management in Washington, Oregon, and California because Congress has formally disapproved it. This legislation aims to prevent that rule from taking effect.
Congress.gov
SJRES 69 - A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Record of Decision for the Barred Owl Management Strategy; Washington, Oregon, and California".
Views
left-leaning 07/24/2025
Protecting owls means protecting our forests — Congress should stop playing whack-a-mole with science.
left-leaning 07/24/2025
Shuttering wildlife protections under the guise of ‘management’? Mother Nature isn’t buying it.
right-leaning 07/24/2025
Federal overreach strikes again—leave the owls to the states and get the government out of the nest.
moderate 07/24/2025
Wildlife rules need transparency and common sense; no blank checks, no blanket bans.
moderate 07/24/2025
Can we agree that saving species and accountability both deserve a fair shake here?
right-leaning 07/24/2025
Killing bureaucracy, one bad rule at a time—good job disapproving this feather-brained strategy.
right-leaning 07/24/2025
Saving owls shouldn’t mean gutting jobs or property rights; this rule’s just bad policy in disguise.
moderate 07/24/2025
Maybe this isn’t about politics, but about balancing nature’s needs with practicality—let’s get it right.
left-leaning 07/24/2025
If you think endangered animals are a nuisance, you’re on the wrong side of history and evolution.