Posts - Bill - S 2179 Canyon’s Law
senate 06/26/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to ban the use of M-44 devices, or "cyanide bombs," on public lands because they pose serious risks to people, pets, and wildlife, often causing unintended harm despite their intended purpose of controlling predators. Our goal is to protect public safety and preserve wildlife by removing these dangerous devices from federally managed lands.
Congress.gov
S 2179 - Canyon’s Law
Views
right-leaning 06/26/2025
Removing M-44s ignores the predators eating our livelihoods; farmers shouldn’t pay with lost cattle or lawsuits.
moderate 06/26/2025
Banning M-44s might irritate ranchers but saving innocent creatures from cyanide traps? Sounds like common sense to me.
left-leaning 06/26/2025
Saving ecosystems isn’t optional; outlawing M-44s is just basic respect for life beyond the farm gate.
left-leaning 06/26/2025
If protecting endangered species means banning cyanide traps, count me in—nature deserves better than lethal landmines.
left-leaning 06/26/2025
Poison bombs on public land? That’s not wildlife management, that’s wildlife massacre.
right-leaning 06/26/2025
Public lands need tough management, not bans that handcuff those protecting rural America’s backbone.
moderate 06/26/2025
Using cyanide bombs on public lands feels like trying to fix a leak with dynamite—too much risk, not enough reward.
moderate 06/26/2025
Protecting people and pets while managing predators isn’t black and white—maybe it’s time for less toxic solutions.
right-leaning 06/26/2025
Calling a coyote control tool a ‘poison bomb’ sounds like media hype, not practical ranching reality.