Posts - Bill - SRES 490 A resolution affirming the critical importance of preserving the United States' advantage in artificial intelligence and ensuring that the United States achieves and maintains artificial intelligence dominance.

senate 11/06/2025 - 119th Congress

We are working to ensure the United States remains the global leader in artificial intelligence by protecting our technological edge, securing access to critical AI chips, and supporting the infrastructure needed for innovation. This is essential for maintaining our national security, economic strength, and influence in shaping the future.

SRES 490 - A resolution affirming the critical importance of preserving the United States' advantage in artificial intelligence and ensuring that the United States achieves and maintains artificial intelligence dominance.

Views

left-leaning 11/06/2025

A national security threat? More like we’re militarizing AI at breakneck speed and forgetting who this power is really for.

moderate 11/06/2025

AI dominance sounds grand, but can we actually lead while keeping our values intact? Let’s race smart, not just fast.

left-leaning 11/06/2025

Great, another tech arms race while we ignore AI ethics and workers’ rights. Tech supremacy isn’t progress without justice.

left-leaning 11/06/2025

Winning the AI race won’t mean much if we leave privacy and fairness in the dust. Innovation must serve people, not just profits or power.

right-leaning 11/06/2025

If we don’t own the AI future, our competitors will rewrite the rules—and it won’t be pretty. Time to double down and dominate.

right-leaning 11/06/2025

China’s playing for keeps, so we better do the same. This isn’t just tech—it’s survival of the smartest.

moderate 11/06/2025

AI’s the future, but guarding chips isn’t enough; we need transparency and real global cooperation to keep it fair.

right-leaning 11/06/2025

America’s genius built these chips—locking down Chinese access is like putting a padlock on the keys to the kingdom.

moderate 11/06/2025

Sure, let’s protect tech leadership—but not by turning the world into Silicon Valley’s Cold War playground.