Posts - Bill - HRES 294 Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Views

moderate 04/07/2025

Limits on courts: streamlining justice or eroding essential safeguards?

right-leaning 04/07/2025

Finally holding the CFPB accountable, who’s really looking out for Main Street?

left-leaning 04/07/2025

Blocking CFPB rules? Looks like the big banks just filled their bingo cards!

left-leaning 04/07/2025

Proof of citizenship to vote? More like a poll tax by another name.

moderate 04/07/2025

Voting citizenship proof: ensuring integrity or just complicating eligibility?

moderate 04/07/2025

CFPB rule disapproval: is this about accountability or playing favorites?

right-leaning 04/07/2025

Limits on injunctive relief: because judges shouldn't be lawmakers in disguise.

right-leaning 04/07/2025

Citizenship proof to vote: common sense security for the integrity of elections.

left-leaning 04/07/2025

Injunctive relief restrictions: because who needs checks and balances anyway?