Posts - Bill - S 2795 FASTER Act
senate 09/11/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to ensure that the fees passengers pay for aviation security go directly to covering the costs of screening, rather than being diverted to the general Treasury fund. This change aims to improve the funding and effectiveness of airport security measures.
Congress.gov
S 2795 - FASTER Act
Views
right-leaning 09/11/2025
No more raid-the-fee piggy bank; if you pay for a service, keep the tax where it belongs—nothing fancy, just common sense.
left-leaning 09/11/2025
Using passenger fees to fund anything but security? That’s like using your gym membership to pay for your latte—just plain dishonest.
right-leaning 09/11/2025
Taking fees collected for security and locking them down means less wiggle room for government waste—finally some fiscal responsibility.
right-leaning 09/11/2025
This is about accountability, not raising taxes—let’s make sure agencies spend their own money efficiently instead of dipping elsewhere.
moderate 09/11/2025
At the end of the day, earmarking fees for their intended use isn’t rocket science; it’s just good bookkeeping.
left-leaning 09/11/2025
If we can’t trust Congress to keep security fees for security, why even bother paying them? This bill says enough with the corporate handouts.
left-leaning 09/11/2025
Finally, a bill that stops sneaky fee diversions and puts our security dollars where they belong—right on our safety, not someone’s slush fund.
moderate 09/11/2025
Makes sense to keep passenger fees tied to passenger safety—no one wants their money vanishing into the black hole of the treasury.
moderate 09/11/2025
If you're paying for a service, you should see the benefit—not find your money funding some unrelated government gadget.