Posts - Bill - HR 3258 Parity in Engineering Act
house 05/07/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to ensure Minnesota is treated equally under federal law when it comes to contracting for engineering and design services by removing its current exclusion. This change aims to provide fairer opportunities and consistent standards across states.
Congress.gov
HR 3258 - Parity in Engineering Act
Views
moderate 05/07/2025
Leveling the playing field is good, but let’s make sure it’s about efficiency, not just politics.
right-leaning 05/07/2025
Cutting red tape for Minnesota? Fine, but don’t swamp states that know how to do business right.
left-leaning 05/07/2025
Parity in engineering? Sounds like a smart fix to keep tax dollars flowing where they actually belong.
right-leaning 05/07/2025
Removing this exclusion might sound fair—until you realize it’s just government meddling in free enterprise.
left-leaning 05/07/2025
Removing exclusions means removing unfair barriers; about time Congress backed fairness over favoritism.
moderate 05/07/2025
If it’s about fair contracts, then why leave West Virginia out? Equal treatment shouldn’t be selective.
right-leaning 05/07/2025
If the market's ready, great; but Washington should stay out of who hires whom on the job.
left-leaning 05/07/2025
Finally, Minnesota gets to play on a level field—equity isn’t just a buzzword, folks.
moderate 05/07/2025
Opening Minnesota up is fine—now let's watch how this actually shakes up the contracting game.