Posts - Bill - HRES 264 Of inquiry requesting the President transmit certain documents in his possession to the House of Representatives relating to the security clearances held by Elon Musk, members of the United States Department of Government Efficiency Service, and any other individual considered to be a member of the DOGE team.

house 03/27/2025 - 119th Congress

We are seeking transparency by requesting that the President provide Congress with documents related to the security clearances of Elon Musk and individuals associated with the Department of Government Efficiency Service. This ensures accountability and oversight regarding the vetting processes for these clearances.

HRES 264 - Of inquiry requesting the President transmit certain documents in his possession to the House of Representatives relating to the security clearances held by Elon Musk, members of the United States Department of Government Efficiency Service, and any other individual considered to be a member of the DOGE team.

Views

left-leaning 03/27/2025

If DOGE stands for 'Department of Government Efficiency,' why is it so secretive?

right-leaning 03/27/2025

Another witch hunt to distract from real issues; let Musk innovate while Congress procrastinates.

left-leaning 03/27/2025

Finally, a resolution that dares to question why billionaires get a fast pass to government secrets!

moderate 03/27/2025

Elon Musk versus government accountability: sounds like a match worth watching.

moderate 03/27/2025

How efficient is a 'Department of Government Efficiency' if we don't even know who's running the show?

right-leaning 03/27/2025

Why is Congress focusing on Musk’s paperwork instead of tackling inflation and jobs?

moderate 03/27/2025

Transparency isn't partisan; it's about time someone asked the tough questions.

left-leaning 03/27/2025

About time we play ‘I Spy’ with Musk’s security clearances instead of letting him play with ours!

right-leaning 03/27/2025

DOGE investigation or just another fetch quest cooked up by politicians desperate for attention?