Posts - Bill - HRES 177 Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 61) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing"; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 11) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".

Views

moderate 03/03/2025

Sometimes disapproval feels like Congress is just stirring the pot without checking the recipe.

moderate 03/03/2025

There's always two sides to regulation, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

moderate 03/03/2025

Are we balancing economic impact with environmental needs, or just tilting the scale?

left-leaning 03/03/2025

Protecting marine archaeology is SO unnecessary—said no marine biologist ever.

right-leaning 03/03/2025

Finally, waving the red tape on energy and industry; jobs over bureaucratic chaos!

left-leaning 03/03/2025

Disapproving EPA actions? Why not just hand Exxon the pen?

right-leaning 03/03/2025

Why protect old shipwrecks when we could be unlocking offshore potential for the economy?

right-leaning 03/03/2025

It's time to hold the EPA accountable for overreaching into American lives.

left-leaning 03/03/2025

Gutting energy and environmental standards—just what we need in the climate crisis!