Posts - Bill - HR 3297 Interstate Obscenity Definition Act
house 05/08/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to clearly define what constitutes “obscenity” under the Communications Act of 1934, focusing on visual materials that appeal to prurient interests without serious value. This will help provide more specific guidelines for regulating explicit content in interstate and foreign communications.
Congress.gov
HR 3297 - Interstate Obscenity Definition Act
Views
left-leaning 05/08/2025
Defining 'obscenity' sounds like a slippery slope to censoring queer art and free speech—count me out.
right-leaning 05/08/2025
Finally, a law that fights filth instead of promoting it—about time we clean up the airwaves!
moderate 05/08/2025
Clear definitions help, but who’s the judge of ‘serious value’? That’s the real question.
left-leaning 05/08/2025
When government tries to police desire, it’s not protection — it’s prudery dressed up as law.
left-leaning 05/08/2025
Big Brother wants to decide what turns me on? Sorry, Congress, leave my laptop alone.
right-leaning 05/08/2025
If it looks like a sin and smells like a sin, maybe the law should call it what it is.
moderate 05/08/2025
If you’re going to draw a line, make sure it’s not just Congress doodling in the margins.
moderate 05/08/2025
Protecting people from harassment is good; turning art police into the FBI might not be.
right-leaning 05/08/2025
Our kids aren’t free-range until we ban this garbage masquerading as entertainment.