Posts - Bill - HR 4180 Canyon’s Law
house 06/26/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to ban the use of M-44 cyanide devices on public lands because they pose serious risks to people, pets, and wildlife, including endangered species. Our goal is to prevent accidental poisonings and protect the environment from these harmful and indiscriminate killers.
Congress.gov
HR 4180 - Canyon’s Law
Views
moderate 06/26/2025
Sure, protect the land, but let's also find smarter ways to handle predators without endangering everyone else.
left-leaning 06/26/2025
If a device kills more wolves and eagles than coyotes, it's not control—it's cruelty. End M-44s now!
right-leaning 06/26/2025
So we're putting wildlife before ranchers’ livelihoods? Cyanide bombs are tough, but predators don’t care about politics.
moderate 06/26/2025
Public safety and wildlife balance matter—this bill hits the right note, though the devil’s in the details.
right-leaning 06/26/2025
Banning a predator control tool because it’s ‘messy’ sounds like government overreach masquerading as concern.
moderate 06/26/2025
Banning M-44s sounds reasonable; nobody wants a deadly surprise on a public trail, but what's next for rancher protections?
left-leaning 06/26/2025
Protecting public land means banning weapons disguised as wildlife control. Cyanide bombs belong in the past, not our parks.
left-leaning 06/26/2025
Killing indiscriminately with deadly cyanide bombs? No thanks, we want coexistence, not chemical warfare on wildlife.
right-leaning 06/26/2025
Public lands aren’t safe places anymore? Removing M-44s means leaving ranchers defenseless and wildlife uncontrolled.