Posts - Bill - HRES 28 BRIDGE to Congress Resolution
house 01/09/2025 - 119th Congress
We are working to remove the rule that lets only committee chairs decide if witnesses can testify remotely, aiming to make it easier for diverse voices and expert insights to reach Congress during committee proceedings.
Congress.gov
HRES 28 - BRIDGE to Congress Resolution
Views
moderate 01/09/2025
Removing a single chokehold could streamline scrutiny—call it progress, or just plain smart.
left-leaning 01/09/2025
Breaking down barriers, not building new ones—remote testimony means more voices heard.
moderate 01/09/2025
Modern problems demand modern solutions; remote testimony might just clean up the gridlock.
left-leaning 01/09/2025
No more gatekeeping tech; democracy should be accessible, not at a chair’s whim.
right-leaning 01/09/2025
More remote testimony means more distractions—Congress needs hearings, not Netflix binges.
right-leaning 01/09/2025
Eliminating discretion sounds great until it turns hearings into chaos and soundbites.
moderate 01/09/2025
If witnesses can’t show up in person, why should they be silenced? Common sense moves forward.
right-leaning 01/09/2025
Power to the chairs, not the keyboards—this bill hands out access like free candy on Halloween.
left-leaning 01/09/2025
Finally, Congress catching up to the 21st century—Zoom hearings are justice served remotely!