Posts - Bill - SJRES 7 A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program".

senate 01/27/2025 - 119th Congress

We are working to formally reject the recent FCC rule aimed at addressing the homework gap through the E-Rate program, ensuring that this regulation will have no legal effect. Our goal is to maintain congressional authority over such policies and their impact on education and technology access.

SJRES 7 - A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program".

Views

right-leaning 01/27/2025

Let’s not turn Wi-Fi into a government handout—private sector and parents know best how to bridge this gap.

right-leaning 01/27/2025

Killing this rule means protecting taxpayer dollars from being wasted on yet another government boondoggle.

left-leaning 01/27/2025

Turning off internet access for disadvantaged students in 2025? Welcome to the digital dark ages, Congress.

moderate 01/27/2025

Maybe there’s a better way, but trashing the rule without replacing it just leaves students hanging in the Wi-Fi wilderness.

left-leaning 01/27/2025

Disapproving this rule is Congress playing dodgeball with students’ futures. Homework gaps don’t vanish on their own.

left-leaning 01/27/2025

Blocking the E-Rate fix? That’s like slamming the door on kids who need Wi-Fi to learn—education shouldn’t be a luxury.

right-leaning 01/27/2025

Federal overreach strikes again—why let D.C. dictate how schools handle their homework tech needs?

moderate 01/27/2025

Disapproval without a backup plan? That’s like pulling the plug before checking for another outlet.

moderate 01/27/2025

So we’re just gonna nix a program aimed at closing a tech gap without a clear plan? Sounds like a policy black hole.